Showing posts with label Union Members. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Union Members. Show all posts

Summer Bid, Concepts and Solidarity 0 Comments

Looks like we will manage to pull it off for summer. As there is a three week delay from the time I write an article, to the time the Labor Press gets to your mailbox, I often take an educated guess as to how certain issues will work out. Given the fact(s), to date we have had 4 people committed to the retirement incentive package out of 8 turned in, and given that out of those 8 turned in we sent out roughly 40 offers, and given that this is just the first week of the offer period my semi-bold guess is that we will make it through the summer without layoffs. Now to focus on Fall.

Pro-EmX:  Debunking The Anti-EmX Concept

It was suggested to me by an individual that some of my recent comments/ criticism of the EmX were closed minded and that in expressing my dismay with the project as a whole, that it was meant (or more it was taken) as me being against the EmX Operators. Now, you all have the right to disagree with me. I encourage it. You have the right to take what I write and interpret it and respond to it as you wish because I am not your boss. But you can't question my dedication and devotion to this membership. I am not in this for me. I am in it for the good of our membership-AS IN-the ENTIRE membership. 

When I speak out against a District or a District project such as the EmX it is always for the reason of giving the membership a voice. Most of my articles come from a consensus of the memberships' views and feedback. 

When it comes to the EmX, my belief of the negative impact it has had and continues to have on the membership is a shared reality amongst the majority of the membership. So really my words are not just my own. SO TO BE CLEAR I am in no way against the EmX operators based on my position on the EmX.Though it sounds as though it is only one fellow member that took it this way - I feel clarification is needed.

As for the EmX  "concept" as a whole, I am not, and never have been, against it (again, in concept). After all I drove the thing myself for a year. Still, we all know "concepts" sometimes don't pan out or go sour, not by any fault of our own. When this happens, the owner of the "concept" is ultimately responsible to adapt, improvise, delay, and if necessary abort, if the concept runs into the for-mentioned troubles or otherwise becomes unsustainable. 

But, when ego is coupled with the "concept" by the owner. It makes it very hard to adapt. When deception is used to promote the concept to the users, the need for improvisation is easily ignored. When heavy obligations are put forth to guarantee the concept to delay or to abort becomes litigious. This is the basic formula associated with the EmX that is troubling to me.

 All Together Now!

Our last two union meetings have been huge! I guess people have had enough of the bullying management tactics. And what better way to fight back than to show up in solidarity. The message of "enough is enough" that came out of those meetings was conveyed to management through your Officers and it made an immediate difference. And that's how it all works people. 

Now, lets keep the pressure on! Management knows we are uniting and that is their worst nightmare. So join me - Guido the Boogie man! If you didn't show up for the last meetings - maybe its time. It it your union. If you were one of the many who showed up thank you, and see you next month.

In Solidarity,
Brian Pasquali
Executive Board Officer
ATU 757 of Lane County

Pensions, Propaganda and Labor --- OH MY! 0 Comments

Happy Holiday's Brothers and Sisters! I recently returned from the annual Pension Trust/Benefits training seminar in Orlando Florida. I took a variety of courses on subjects ranging from Fiduciary Responsibilities of a Trustee, to Health and Wellness Programs. As one of the 4 Trustees on our pension, I am obligated and appreciate the huge responsibility that comes with it. The material provided through these courses ensures that I have the proper training to manage our fund responsibly. One thing is for sure, as 2009 comes to a close, we are breathing a little bit easier, fiscally speaking.

Pension and Health trust funds all over the country took huge hits during the early part of this year and adjustments had to be made where they could. Some Public plans such as PERS, while initially looked as though they would weather the storm, took massive hits (see Climbing PERS expenses face Oregon pension board, agency budget writers). Luckily we are not a PERS and have significantly more control over our Fund as it is fairly small and sleek. All in all, It looks as if the Market has finally bottomed out now, and while we can hope more for a "V" like recovery (a sharp down, followed by an equally sharp up), all indications are that the rebound will be more gradually with some additional bumps still to come.



Time To Prepare

As winter creeps in and negotiations on other properties progress, your local officers are hard at work gathering data, marking the date's, and setting the strategy for our sessions. While we cannot out and out divulge our strategy, there are some keys to remember as we make our approach:

1st Key - Whatever differences we have with one another...whether you have, or have not been in a union before...whether in the past you just felt left out of the process, or just didn't want to be involved...now is the time for us to come together in solidarity for our future. If you have questions or suggestions we are listening. Bottom line - If you want MORE, If you want YOUR voice heard - participate. 

2nd key - Expect fierce resistance from the other side as we approach negotiations. Expect anything from ticky-tacky procedural write ups as a driver, to a full on sickening propaganda campaign. They will tell you that "you make enough", and are "lucky to have a job"... They will tell you "The District is struggling to pay for your benefits", and that you get "so much already"... And they will tell you that Your Union, "is the problem"...So they will be lying.

When you hear the proverbial smack talk going around - like say - a newer road supervisor, one that never attended ONE Union meeting much less participate in his short time as a driver, "casually" commenting that "your union is weak" - you tell him, Sorry - you already heard the truth: The truth is that even the so-called "respectable" pay and benefits he has now, as a supervisor, are the result of a struggle that started long ago with the Headly's and the Allred's and the other brave Union soldiers that wouldn't take NO for an answer, and that same struggle continues to this day! (He only forgot to mention those insignificant details.)


"Don't let any man into your cab, your home, or your heart, unless he's a friend of labor."-Jimmy Hoffa

In the spirit of organization, I invite you to join our Facebook Page . Also we have some great links being collected on delicious (a bookmarking site), which range from labor history, labor theory & law, to articles about the economy - which may be of some interest to you.

In Solidarity,

Brian Pasquali
Executive Board Officer
ATU 757 of Lane County

Four Take Leave - Four Releaved 0 Comments

As Four Operators Take The Furlough - It Allowed Four Other Operators Jobs to Be Saved

Without a doubt the Furlough program was a success. There was a minor problem that can be corrected I will mention later in this post. The first three were gone before day one of the bid was complete and the 4th closed the offer after a handful of people bid on the second day. Those that bid the summer furlough seemed very happy to be able to do so while keeping benefits and seniority rank while the 4 that in turn were able to keep employment at least until we cross the next bridge are somewhat relieved they do not have to search for a Job in this unforgiving Lane County job market.

I have heard from many of you that it would be nice if this was a regular offer and that many more of you would have accepted the leave had it made it to your seniority level. I agree, and I will be working with the District to explore our options in the future-layoffs or not. It may be something we look to get added either before or during Contract talks. I will keep the membership informed but I see this as a possible way the District can save some money and the Membership can take a few months off

One flaw was detected on the last day of bid week that was brought o my attention by someone that had bid vacation board and was waiting to select which weeks to sign for. Basically those who took furloughs also had bid vacation weeks for the summer back in March. Because these operators had the took the furlough, the days off were undetermined but it was reasonable to assume that as the 4 nearly always bid Sat and Suns as their days off-it would stay that way. So their names were posted as taking the furlough, but, days off were not posted as with other bidders at the time the vacation board operators signed up for the VACO board. Those considering bidding the Vacation Board have a very good idea how many weekends are to be available due to the fact that the operators scheduled for vacation that week have already picked a run showing their days off or have routinely pick the same days off in the past. So when any operator signs for the VACO board they sort of gauge what they see other operators s have taken for vacation during that bid and sign up, or don't sign up accordingly. If the four furlough takers listed normally take Sat and Sun off for their normal week it would be a reasonable assumption that that those days off would remain constant even during a furlough. When the District designated bid room personnel made the choice to change those consistent days off from Sat and Sun to other combinations of Days off they did so after the bid began and after the vacation board operators signed up for the Vacation board. While they have the right to do this they needed to notify all operators considering to sign for the vacation board so to ensure proper warning. Instead it became an unfair practice and because it made what vacation board bidders use as a long standing practice for making their choice of work it the ATU will likely request a Vacation Board rebid. I will be asking we restart the process of selection of VACO weeks based on this. The process should take only 8 hours but those hours will be broken up over the course of 4 or 5 days. I will conduct the sign up personally in an effort to save the District the cost. In addition I will try to do so in the without mark off by catching up with drivers before and after their scheduled run. So with this section of the bid being conducted by the ATU at almost no cost tot he district, the request for VACO Board rebid with the appropriate days off reset, shouldn't be denied.

What I will say about this oversight is that being the Furlough program was a ground breaking, one these types of anomalies are inevitable. But as the District bid personnel deliberately changed the days off and failed to properly notify the Operators or the Union before operators had signed up-the request to rebid is based on the principle of unfair notice. While I check over the run cut thoroughly before the bid is posted and before it begins, it makes it harder to stop the train after the bid is underway. Lets hope the District does the right thing here.






YOUR News


ATU 757 Members: Got a Story? Want to be a guest blogger? Want to share tips? [Tell Us ]

ATU News Feed


Subscribe Here>>
Email Follow our FriendFeed Follow us On Twitter Bookmark on Delicious Add us to your Technorati Favs Stumble Us

Template design by Amber All Rights Reserved © 2009-2010. Content ©2009-2010 ATU 757 of Lane County or respective authors.

Back to TOP  

,