Furloughs - Not Just For Criminals... Anymore!
Tags: ATU 757, Brian Pasquali, furlough, GOOD NEWS, Jon Hunt, Lay-offs, LMC, Obama, Retirement Incentive Packages, Sam Schwartz, Seniority, Stimulus, Summer Bid, The District, You - The MembershipOh FURLOUGH where out thou?
Out comes the sun finally. So I realize the first post was somewhat negative and I want to make it known that is not why we began the site. However, shortly after the first post we made some progress if not a breakthrough in averting the 4 layoffs.
4 furlough packages will be offered to operators wishing to take the summer bid off while retaining all health dental and vision benefits at no cost to them. Seniority will remain intact and vacations will still be paid out as they would have. This leave without pay furlough will be offered by seniority during the summer bid this week. Basically you have another choice besides a run. Not too shabby. This may be all we need to keep the 4. We shall see.
Furloughs - Not Just For Criminals., Anymore!
How did we get to this point?
Early this year and in late 2008 when the number was at its high point at 26 layoffs as opposed to the 4 now, your ATU leadership (Jon, Sam and myself) began to brainstorm for ways to keep people here. After suggesting many of these idea's at the LMC (labor management committee) the initial strategy the District and the ATU came up with was the retirement incentive packages.
OF course, shortly after getting this project underway, news of President Obama's stimulus package passing was a game changer. Where initially the District had entertained a higher dollar value for each package with the number of of layoffs being lowered there would be less need for incentive. The packages stayed but the buyout figure was less than what most operators felt would be a fair.
So bottom line at the last L.M.C meeting on April 23rd, the District informed us that there were no buyout takers on the Operators side. AS a result, Management informed us 4 layoffs would be likely made but set no time line. We had assumed as the initial threat of 26 layoffs was set for Fall, then that would be the time they would notify us. Also at that LMC the union was still suggesting alternatives. The furlough was brought up as well as a re-offer of the incentive packages. We left under the reasonable assumption more of an effort would be taken by all before layoffs were announced. Unfortunately this was not the case and Operations Directors made the announcement to each employee while the Union leadership was out of town on a business trip.
REMEMBER TO VOTE IN OUR UNION ELECTIONS. BALLOTS ARE ON THE WAY TO YOU IN THE MAIL.
3 comments:
Although this summer bid was a true roller coaster ride for the 4 of "US" who where in the line of fire for layoffs. I was truly taken back by offers to help by many members. We all have herd the phrase "TALK IS CHEAP", maybe so, but not giving a "REP" (no this is not a Miss Spell) is even easier. So from my heart sincerely THANK YOU for your concern. I would also like to say in closing JODI N. I WILL MISSSSSSSSS you this Much------------------------------------------------- please take care. You where so excepting when we came on board at LTD, I have never had so much fun turning RED in my life. Jodi would you still love me if I can't DANCE!
@Anonymous:
First off I appreciate your comment (first one on the blog!).
It is nice to hear perspective from one of the "4".
I am glad that we were able to provide support and be there for our fellow brothers and sisters!
That is what solidarity is all about. That is why I am in this union position, I really care for my fellow drivers and how their livelyhood is affected.
Just read the Labor Press ATU Officer Reports and I have the website. I will be reading the website on a weekly basis. T Heatley
Post a Comment
All comments are subject to moderation. All questions or comments will be answered - but not guaranteed to be published.
We take privacy very seriously.
Comments containing co-worker's first names will only be published with prior member's permission. Comments where a last name is used, or where a member could be implicated,will not be accepted.